Regicide and Republicanism

This exploration of seventeenth-century monarchy highlights how critiques of Charles I's reign resonate with modern discussions on governance, as seen in Regicide and Republicanism.

In Regicide and Republicanism, the author delves into the intricate dynamics of seventeenth-century monarchy, particularly focusing on the reign of Charles I. The book posits that the critiques aimed at Charles I's potentially absolutist monarchy bear striking similarities to contemporary arguments against constitutional monarchy. This analysis reveals a historical continuum in the discourse surrounding governance, suggesting that the foundations of political critique have deep historical roots.

The narrative emphasizes the distinction made during this period between the individual who occupies a political office and the institution itself. The author argues that personal morality and behavior were critical in evaluating the effectiveness and legitimacy of government. As the political landscape evolved post-1646, two distinct strands of thought emerged. One faction advocated for a government grounded in laws, leading to a republican response to the turmoil of the 1640s. Conversely, another group focused on the notion that people, rather than laws, were responsible for governance, directing their criticism towards Charles I himself and ultimately supporting regicide.

Through detailed analysis and historical context, Regicide and Republicanism explores the implications of these ideological battles and their relevance to modern political discourse. By examining the motivations behind these arguments and their outcomes, the book provides valuable insights into the complexities of political authority and the nature of governance, both in the past and present.