The Imaginary Geography of Hollywood Cinema 1960-2000

'The book sits well alongside other recent monographs of US cinema’s spatial politics, such as Mark Shiel’s Hollywood Cinema and the Real Los Angeles (2012) and Lawrence Webb’s The Cinema of Urban Crisis (2014), and further demonstrates the value of geographical interpretations of cinema. In Chapters 2 and 3 in particular, Long brilliantly connects spatial content (and spatial politics) to wider shifting trends and industrial developments, revealing with clarity the tight interrelationship between dominant modes of filmmaking and the spaces that are being put on-screen. Whether his insights in this respect could only have been mobilized through the use of the literal maps that Long provides and from which his project launched is perhaps open to debate; however, he certainly succeeds in demonstrating that location is ‘an underexplored and powerful explanatory force’ shaping both the themes and the underlying ideologies of particular film texts and of the industry more generally (10). This is not to say that space crowds out other concerns; rather, paying attention to geography allows for the better placement – not only spatially, but culturally, historically and politically – of cinema. As Long states, ‘Hollywood films that perform the best at the box office and in year-end prestige lists render a great deal of the United States – and the people who live there and their particular ways of life – invisible to their audiences’ (233). This book does a great deal of useful work in rendering visible such absences and encouraging us to look for more.'

-- Nick Jones, European Journal of American Culture

‘....Long’s way of posing spatial questions about film is both stylistically and conceptually incisive. He puts his book’s research interest in a nutshell when asking ‘what – or better yet, exactly where – “America” means in Hollywood cinema’ (p. 12, emphasis in original). In answering this question, The Imaginary Geography of Hollywood Cinema offers to expand the geographical horizon of what readers perceive as American film and as America on film.’

-- Elisa Jochum, University College London, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 2019 Vol. 39, No. 1, 187�