Rethinking Zapotec Time

Rethinking Zapotec Time makes several significant contributions. It is a major synthesis of documentary evidence from the Zapotec mantic and ritual manuals that is both revisionist and encyclopedic. David Tavárez’s work has succeeded in mining the manuals' content to understand local historical processes and to link them as part of a longue durée in the production of knowledge by Zapotec peoples that goes back more than a thousand years. The book also sheds new light on highly debated issues concerning Mesoamerican calendrics and synchronology with European time, as well as oncontested interpretations of obscure passages in the Codex Borgia and other divinatory manuscripts.— Javier Urcid, Brandeis University, co-author of The Lords of Lambityeco: Political Evolution in the Valley of Oaxaca during the Xoo Phase
This book introduces participants in a 'republic of letters' in the Zapotec language who, in the 1600s, created something new through their combination of ancestral knowledge and new knowledge from the Spanish realm. With its focus on actors outside the colonial political hierarchy, the book gives extraordinary insight into the lives of residents of colonial Indigenous towns that were locally administered, often only lightly overseen from distant political and religious centers. David Tavárez’s understanding of Zapotec history and cultural achievement is without parallel. The analysis of Zapotec literacy as 'anti-colonial discourses' contributes to  an important global reconsideration of Indigenous lives under colonial power.— Rosemary Joyce, University of California at Berkeley, author of Ancient Bodies, Ancient Lives: Sex, Gender, and Archaeology
Rooted in the exceptional linguistic skills and erudition of David Tavárez, this study of Zapotec-language calendric texts and ritual songs not only explains the workings of northern Zapotec pre-Hispanic and early colonial timekeeping, it reveals the multifaceted intellectual traditions of colonial indigenous ritual specialists. They fostered intense communal efforts to maintain sacred beliefs and local practices, sometimes leading to dissent within communities and suppressive efforts from Catholic officials. Nonetheless, the Zapotec sacred survived—transformed in some ways—until today, a story Tavárez brilliantly details.
 — Susan Kellogg, University of Houston, co-editor of Género y Arqueología en Mesoamérica: Homenaje a Rosemary A. Joyce
This is a superb study of both the Indigenous secret republics of letters and their Indigenous rivals. It is also a brilliant analysis of Zapotec divinatory colonial practices.— Jorge Cañizares-Esguerra, University of Texas at Austin, author of How to Write the History of the New World: Histories, Epistemologies, and Identities in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World
Rethinking Zapotec Time is an enormous accomplishment [that] will become an important element of graduate education, and a building block for new research ... David Tavárez, a formidable historian and linguist of colonial-era Zapotec and Nahuatl, brings us a book that is informed by two decades of work [which] contributes to ongoing discussions about the interaction of missionary Catholicism with traditional indigenous beliefs . . . To a non-specialist such as the current reviewer (who reads neither Nahuatl nor Zapotec), this book is a powerful demonstration of the back-breaking labor undertaken by peers in the field of Mesoamerican philology. For the specialists themselves, I expect Rethinking Zapotec Time will become an important element of graduate education, and a building block for new research.— International Journal of Latin American Religions

David Tavárez is one of the first [researchers] to emphasize the importance of the intellectual production of Indigenous people in their own language, and ... at last, a long-awaited monograph has been published, one that is the result of a notably complex and lengthy research project, carried out over more than 20 years ... The book contains eight chapters, each of which is practically a monograph about a concrete theme or question.

David Tavárez ha sido de los primeros en destacar la importancia de la producción intelectual indígena en su propia lengua, y ... se publica por fin una monografía largamente esperada, fruto de un proyecto de investigación de largo aliento y notable complejidad, llevado a cabo a lo largo de más de 20 años... El libro se compone de 8 capítulos, cada uno de los cuales es prácticamente una monografía sobre una temática o problemática concreta.

— Revista de Indias
Undoubtedly this book is a unique compendium of the religious culture and theogony of America’s native peoples, I have no doubt that it will become obligatory consultation for specialists of various disciplines and graduate students interested in this subject and in the Indigenous colonial world in general.— The Americas
Insightful, well-supported arguments...essential reading for students of colonial Mesoamerica...Tavárez has done an impressive service for both academic scholars and descendent communities alike.— Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology

Without a doubt, this book... is an exceptional compendium of the religious culture and the theogonic beliefs of [Indigenous] peoples, and thus I am certain that it will be a classic work that must be consulted by anyone interested in the topic and in colonial worlds in general.

Sin duda este libro, como los manuales que estudió David Tavárez, es un excepcional compendio sobre la cultura religiosa y el pensamiento teogónico de los pueblos [indígenas], por lo que no me cabe duda de que será una obra clásica de consulta obligada para todos aquellos interesados en este tema y en el del mundo colonial en general.

— Historia Mexicana
Tavárez's monograph fills in many gaps on Mesoamerican time-keeping practices, giving readers a more complete picture of Native ways of understanding throughout this large region. Tavárez’s ambitious archival scope pays off whenever he introduces the ways that Zapotecs talked about their time-keeping theories and methods.... [He] help[s] illuminate the trajectory of a centuries-old tension between Native epistemologies and European interventions.— Journal of the American Academy of Religion