Red, White, and Kind of Blue?

"David Schneiderman makes a compelling case for his vision of Canadian constitutional culture as something distinctive and worth preserving. His work is original, insightful, and of interest to readers in both Canada and the United States." -- Vicki C. Jackson, Thurgood Marshall Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law School "Unlike most constitutional texts that are readable only by lawyers, Red, White, and Kind of Blue? is a good read for anyone interested in Canada's constitutional system of government as it differs from the American system. David Schneiderman brings home the importance of recognizing how our constitutional culture, unlike the American, has a flexibility that enables constitutional growth and innovative public policy choices." -- Rob Walsh, Former Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel at the House of Commons, Ottawa "Red, White, and Kind of Blue? represents a clear-eyed, dispassionate analysis of Canadian constitutional culture and its shift towards a more American model. This is a book that is sure to give rise to important and provocative discussions." -- Lorne Sossin, Dean, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

David Schneiderman offers a critical perspective on the Americanization of Canadian constitutional practice and a timely warning about its unexamined consequences.

Situated between two different constitutional traditions, those of the United Kingdom and the United States, Canada has maintained a distinctive third way: federal, parliamentary, and flexible. Yet in recent years it seems that Canadian constitutional culture has been moving increasingly in an American direction. Through the prorogation crises of 2008 and 2009, its senate reform proposals, and the appointment process for Supreme Court judges, Stephen Harper’s Conservative government has repeatedly shown a tendency to push Canada further into the US constitutional orbit.

Red, White, and Kind of Blue? is a comparative legal analysis of this creeping Americanization, as well as a probing examination of the costs and benefits that come with it. Comparing British, Canadian, and American constitutional traditions, David Schneiderman offers a critical perspective on the Americanization of Canadian constitutional practice and a timely warning about its unexamined consequences.