Decency and Difference

“Nobody, presumably, wants to be indecent, and this excellent book by Steven C. Roach explores the significance but also the hypocrisy of 'decency' in international relations. This is a challenging book in the best of ways and is a must-read for anybody concerned with the ethics of the global order.”
​—Ilan Baron, Durham University

"Decency and Difference​ examines decency as a core component of the politics of power, identity, and justice in the global arena... Using cases from liberal democracies to developing states and then international organizations, Roach shows how decency can manipulate its liberal foundations, provoking backlash. Recommended."
—CHOICE

* CHOICE *

“Groundbreaking….Calling for what he describes as the 'affective reinvestment' in 'new conditions of communication and interaction,' Roach argues that there is a need to develop a more pluralistic, 'heterodox' understanding of decency: this is a moral and political propriety capable of accounting for difference within the overarching structures that already undergird international society. Roach makes a compelling case for a 'bottom-up' approach to humanitarian ethics, one that seeks to preserve the best aspects of the liberal tradition—namely those pertaining to human rights and universal dignity protections—whilst not succumbing to the forces of retrogression that have, in recent history, formed in response to these aspects of our world’s liberal institutions. Roach’s book illustrates—with argumentative force—how we might begin to change the 'story' of global politics and, just maybe, how we might begin to take more dignified steps in a just, democratic direction."
—Journal of International Political Theory

"Yet even now decency is still little studied, theorized and/or a critiqued concept. No longer. Thankfully, Roach has offered us an elegant and elaborate history, analysis, critique, and implications of decency….of major importance and value…for a variety of academic perspectives, legal practices, and policy implication, especially dealing with global perspectives on human rights. It will be the starting point for considerations of decency, all too lacking today with the many reactionary populisms and ethno-religious nationalisms defending differences and hierarchies that are harmful to many people. Let us hope that his strong defense of liberal decency as a basic human right, not only inspires more scholarship, but influences political and cultural leaders to give us a more decent world."
—Populism

* Populi