Free Exercise of Religion and the United States Constitution

This book explores the inconsistencies in the Supreme Court's free exercise jurisprudence, aiming for a clearer understanding of religious protections under the Constitution.

The protections for conscience outlined in the United States Constitution are often perceived as strong, yet their application has varied significantly over time. The Supreme Court has frequently provided questionable justifications for this inconsistency, all while claiming to adhere to a single guiding principle. This paradox highlights the complexities surrounding the interpretation of religious freedoms in the U.S. legal system.

The United States is marked by a rich tapestry of religious beliefs, and individuals often find themselves grappling with the law in light of their sincere convictions. The First Amendment guarantees the free exercise of religion, leading to a multitude of Supreme Court decisions that delve into the nuances of these protections. Free Exercise of Religion and the United States Constitution examines the Court's jurisprudence, analyzing what constitutes religion and the varying degrees of protection afforded to different practices. Unfortunately, the lack of a clear and consistent framework has resulted in similar cases being treated in disparate ways.

This book aims to clarify the Supreme Court's stance on free exercise, striving to foster a more coherent and principled approach to jurisprudence. By addressing the inconsistencies and providing a comprehensive overview, Free Exercise of Religion and the United States Constitution hopes to contribute to a better understanding of the rights of both religious and non-religious individuals.