From Hysteria to Hormones

“Koerber challenges the view of medical discovery and practice as an ever-ascendant trajectory, invoking instead the philosophical concept of topological time as a nonlinear folding and twisting of expert and popular concepts of biology and behavior. Recommended.”

—S. W. Moss Choice

“Through careful dissection of the established rhetorical history of women’s reproductive health breakthroughs in medicine, Koerber develops a rhetorical topology that rhetoricians of science and medicine will find methodologically useful as they interrogate the unique rhetorical exigences of science and medicine.”

—Jillian Klean Zwilling Women’s Studies in Communication

“Another valuable entry in the growing area of rhetorical history of medical rhetorics.”

—John Lynch The Quarterly Journal of Speech

“In situating the science of women’s ‘hormones’ in the deep history of ‘hysteria,’ Koerber refutes any reductive tales of linear scientific progress. From Hysteria to Hormones shows not only that ‘science moves in many directions all at once,’ but also how some of those movements produce novelty that reconstructs old ideas in order to keep them lively. Scholars interested in feminism, science studies, and rhetoric will find this a vivid, provocative, and creative analysis.”

—Celeste M. Condit, author of Decoding Abortion Rhetoric: Communicating Social Change

“From Hysteria to Hormones offers the reader a series of close rhetorical readings of medical history, revealing turbulent and uneven transformations in perceptions of women’s bodies across centuries. Utilizing Michel Serres’s theory of time as topological, Amy Koerber interleaves rhetorical concepts in an analysis that begins with Hippocrates and ends with ‘pregnancy brain.’ Throughout, she carefully demonstrates that relying on hormonal explanations for women’s behavior is not all that different from talking about wandering wombs.”

—Bernice L. Hausman, author of Viral Mothers: Breastfeeding in the Age of HIV/AIDS

“A wide-ranging and innovative book that upends the story that hormone discovery marked a break with outmoded knowledge about women’s bodies, arguing instead that hormone research required rhetorical reinvestment in old notions of hysteria. Employing Michel Serres’s concept of topology, Koerber conducts a nuanced, multimodal analysis of key moments in the historic reworking of hysteria into hormones. Eschewing a linear approach, she examines ways that the history of medical discourse about women’s bodies has looped and twisted back on itself as opposed to ‘advancing.’ Readers interested in the history of medical discourses about women or about rhetorical methods of historiography will find much to appreciate.”

—Nathan Stormer, author of Sign of Pathology: U.S. Medical Rhetoric on Abortion, 1800s–1960s

“Koerber expands our knowledge of theories of women’s bodies and behaviors, while she deepens our understanding of what it means to write rhetorical history. With strong documentary evidence and brilliant ‘rhetorical-topological’ analysis, she reveals that ancient and contemporary accounts of women’s health are more alike than we might think. In the growing field of rhetoric of health and medicine, and in science and technology studies more generally, Amy Koerber is the real thing.”

—Judy Z. Segal, author of Health and the Rhetoric of Medicine

“Steeped in rich primary sources and evocative analysis, Amy Koerber's From Hysteria to Hormones re-envisions the history of women's health by demonstrating how the discovery of hormones did not so much revolutionize science and medicine as it created an exigency for reinscribing long-held arguments grounded, often, in misogyny and myth. Koerber's book is at the forefront of scholarship in the rhetoric of science, technology, and medicine, and is not to be missed by students of rhetorical history.”

—Robin E. Jensen, author of Infertility: Tracing the History of a Transformative Term

“By way of meticulously researched and analyzed rhetorical artifacts, From Hysteria to Hormones documents in compelling fashion how earlier ideas of biological difference and inferiority are never fully abandoned but in fact inform and animate later scientific theories, including those in circulation today. Even more, this important book theorizes these conceptual processes as thoroughly rhetorical and therefore also historical and contingent. For those interested in understanding both the limits to, and possibilities for, a non-normative, feminist language of sexual difference, this book is indispensable reading.”

—Kelly E. Happe, author of The Material Gene: Gender, Race, and Heredity After the Human Genome Project