The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott

“This book is of very high quality and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of Oakeshott’s philosophy. It is both interesting and innovative in its interpretations, and presents the ideas with an admirable degree of clarity.”

—David Boucher, University of Wales

“Effectively shows that Oakeshott’s thinking goes well beyond the political to encompass much that is central to twentieth-century academic philosophy”

—Library Journal

“The Philosophy of Michael Oakshott is the best overview of its subject so far by a considerable distance, and deserves to become the standard work wherever this unjustly neglected philosopher is studied.”

—Luke O’Sullivan History of Political Thought

“Terry Nardin’s book provides the most extensive consideration of Oakeshott's philosophical endeavours to date. The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott is a significant contribution to scholarship on Oakeshott’s work. It brings to the forefront an extremely important area of his thought that, for the most part, has not received adequate attention. The setting of Oakeshott’s thought in the context of twentieth-century philosophical reflection upon the character of experience and the world, and the appropriate ways in which to understand the lived world of human conduct also invites the consideration of those with a more general interest in twentieth-century philosophy.”

—Glenn Worthington Review of Politics

“There is not only a refreshing disregard for the well-worn grooves of Oakeshott scholarship but a careful effort at explaining Oakeshott’s arguments on a number of philosophical issues where his views are often caricatured or wrongly assimilated with those of contemporary philosophers. . . . Nardin’s decision to approach Oakeshott as a philosopher and to stress how little of Oakeshott’s work published in his own lifetime was actually concerned with politics . . . serves the reader well.”

—Jeremy Rayner Canadian Journal of Political Science

“'Every man, I suppose, has his political opinions,’ Michael Oakeshott once asserted, ‘but a political philosopher has something more, and more significant, than political opinions: he has an analysis of political activity, a comprehensive view of the nature of political life, and it is this … which is profitable for a later and different age to study’ (Oakeshott, ‘Thomas Hobbes,’ Scrutiny 4 [1935–36]: 265). Terry Nardin seems inspired by Oakeshott to take this attitude a step further, as if to say a political philosopher may have an analysis of political activity, but a philosopher has something more significant, a comprehensive view of human experience, and it is this that is profitable for a later age to study.

[This book] [P]rovides a challenging view to Oakeshott scholars and a thorough, clear starting place for all those interested in his ideas.”

—Steven A. Gerencser Perspectives on Politics

“Nardin’s book can be praised as the comprehensive philosophical account of Oakeshott’s enterprise that it wants to be.”

—Bijdragen: International Journal in Philosophy and Theology

“Terry Nardin, who teaches at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, has produced an excellent interpretation of the work of Michael Oakeshott.

In the current book, he extends his analysis beyond the focus on politics alone to consider the significance of Oakeshott’s thinking for the social sciences, for the understanding of truth, for analyzing the relation of theory and practice, and indeed for his distinctive view of the nature of philosophy itself.

It is a work that combines praise with scholarly exactitude. It is a philosophic response to a philosophic life.”

—Timothy Fuller Ethics

“Nardin is adept at drawing out and linking the detail of Oakeshott’s writing and has given us a fascinating and penetrating narrative of those parts of his work that he considers both important and insufficiently appreciate.”

—James Connelly Contemporary Political Theory

“It is the aim of Terry Nardin’s admirable book to reveal Oakeshott the philosopher, and to make clear that the philosopher—even the political philosopher—is not always a moralist. It looks to show that understanding can in fact be pursued, not for any further purpose, political or otherwise, but for its own sake. Oakeshott took as one of his tasks as a philosopher the understanding of human conduct. Nardin’s task in this book is the understanding of Michael Oakeshott, the philosopher.”

—Chandran Kukathas Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

“The value of this, as Nardin shows us, is that it will give us a more accurate understanding of one of the twentieth century’s most imaginative thinkers. More than this, however, it might also lead us to reflect more critically on the practice of philosophy.”

—Chandran Kukathas Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews