Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts

Over the past two decades, there has been a notable increase in international courts and tribunals. This book evaluates their effectiveness by comparing stated goals with actual outcomes and analyzing key indicators.

Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts examines the significant increase in the number of international courts and tribunals over the past two decades, along with their expanding jurisdictions. The author employs social science methodologies to evaluate the effectiveness of these institutions and critically assesses their performance against the expectations that led to their establishment. The book poses essential questions about the role of international courts in governance and explores why some courts seem to be more effective than others.

The first section of the book focuses on the theoretical framework and methodology used to measure effectiveness. It outlines a model that incorporates various components, addresses its potential and limitations, and discusses the challenges involved in measuring effectiveness in the context of international law. By providing a structured approach, the author sets the stage for a deeper understanding of how these courts operate and the criteria by which their success can be judged.

In the subsequent parts, the book analyzes various indicators such as jurisdiction, judicial independence, legitimacy, and compliance, which are crucial for achieving effectiveness. The author applies the effectiveness model to a range of prominent institutions, including the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, showcasing the diversity within the field of international adjudication. By comparing stated goals with actual outcomes, this work contributes valuable insights into the impact and significance of international courts and tribunals in contemporary governance.