Against Coherence

In Against Coherence, Erik Olsson critiques the coherence theory of knowledge, arguing that coherence may not guarantee truth and can hinder belief formation.

In Against Coherence, Erik Olsson presents a comprehensive examination of coherence and its relationship to probable truth, challenging the prevailing notions in epistemology. He argues that the commonly held belief that coherence among a person's beliefs suggests their truth is fundamentally flawed. Throughout the book, Olsson meticulously critiques the coherence theory of knowledge, highlighting the confusion that arises from the lack of clear definitions and the ambiguous nature of the concept of truth-conduciveness. This book stands out as the most extensive and detailed study on the topic to date, setting new benchmarks for clarity and precision in philosophical discourse.

Olsson proposes a thought-provoking perspective, suggesting that incoherence can play a crucial role in the belief formation process. Rather than supporting the idea that coherence is essential for acquiring or justifying beliefs, he posits that incoherence may actually drive individuals to retract false beliefs, thereby challenging the positive role traditionally ascribed to coherence. This shift in perspective invites readers to reconsider the implications of coherence in their own inquiries and understanding of truth.

The interdisciplinary approach taken by Olsson is another noteworthy aspect of Against Coherence. He seamlessly integrates insights from various fields, demonstrating that the arguments regarding coherence apply to diverse types of information, including beliefs, memories, and testimonies. Written in an accessible manner, the book also provides a historical context, tracing the evolution of coherence theories from early philosophers to contemporary thinkers, making it an engaging read for both epistemologists and anyone interested in the nature of truth.