Debating Education

This book features a dialogue between scholars David Schmidtz and Harry Brighouse on education, discussing market roles in policy reform, inequality, and the moral responsibilities of educational opportunities.

Debating Education features a dialogue between two prominent scholars, David Schmidtz and Harry Brighouse, who explore the role of markets in education policy reform. Their conversation centers on the concept of education as a public good, with each scholar presenting distinct perspectives on the issue. Schmidtz advocates for a market-driven approach, arguing that educational opportunities do not need to be equal to be effective. He emphasizes that the goal of education should be to prepare each student to contribute meaningfully, rather than simply ensuring equal preparation for all.

In contrast, Brighouse highlights the importance of addressing inequality in educational outcomes. He expresses concern over the unequal distribution of rewards in society and argues that justice demands a focus on improving opportunities for the bottom 30% of the population, whose prospects are disproportionately bleak. Brighouse is skeptical of market mechanisms, citing various systemic challenges, including market imperfections and political influences, that hinder the ability of education to serve as a tool for social equity.

At its core, Debating Education delves into the complexities of voluntary exchange as a social relationship, particularly in the context of education. The book raises important questions about the nature and legitimacy of market involvement in educational systems, distinguishing it from other forms of trade between consenting adults. This thought-provoking work is particularly relevant for scholars and students interested in ethics, political philosophy, and public policy, as it navigates the intricate interplay between education, justice, and market dynamics.