Contesting Revisionism

This book explores the motivations behind states' revisionist behaviors, particularly in the context of the United States and China, advocating for "soft" revisionism and offering policy recommendations to enhance international stability.

"Contesting Revisionism" delves into the motivations behind states like the United States and China as they navigate the complexities of the international order. The authors explore the concept of revisionism, which refers to a state's inclination to challenge established norms, rules, and institutions. By critiquing existing discussions on revisionism, they seek to understand the historical context and evolution of foreign policy orientations among revisionist states.

The book introduces a set of indicators designed to assess and compare the revisionist tendencies of contemporary powers, particularly the United States and China. The authors challenge the assumption that historical patterns will inevitably repeat themselves, arguing that traditional forms of revisionism, characterized by warfare and conquest, are less feasible in the current global landscape. Instead, they posit that "soft" revisionism, which aims for institutional change through diplomatic means, is more pertinent today.

Focusing on Sino-American relations, the authors contend that prevailing theories, such as power transition theory, oversimplify the dynamics at play. They assert that a dominant power does not always seek to uphold the international order, nor does a rising power necessarily have a revisionist agenda. The transformation of international order can occur without a direct power transition, and such transitions do not automatically lead to conflict. The book concludes with practical policy recommendations aimed at fostering international stability and reducing tensions between the United States and China.